Mandate and authority
Written mandate, decision authority and signatory capacity.
INM-DealUnderwrite / v1.0
Analysis unit: transfer_contract_case
Underwrite thecontract, not the person.
Screen mandate, rights, rules, integrity and independent review before weighing demand, cash conversion, downside, execution and exit.
Educational pre-screen only. Not a valuation, investment recommendation, legal opinion or approval to transact.
Case shape / 01
Define the contract case.
This screen assesses contractual rights, obligations and cash-flow mechanics. It does not assess a person or sporting ability.
Hard gates / 02
Clear authority before quality.
Any blocking issue returns NO-GO. Any unconfirmed gate returns REFER. In both cases the engine generates no quality score.
Commercial quality / 03
Score quality. Keep evidence separate.
The eight weights total 100. Evidence confidence is reported independently and never inflates commercial quality.
20
15
15
15
10
10
10
5
INM-DealUnderwrite / screening output
REFER
REFER- Quality score
- Not generated
- Underwriting band
- Not assigned
- Evidence confidence
- Not Assessed
- Analysis unit
- Transfer contract case
Rights and chain of title
Executed instruments and records establishing ownership, assignment and enforceability.
Applicable football rules and third-party influence
Independent rules analysis covering the relevant associations, jurisdictions and influence restrictions.
Conflicts and integrity
Conflict declarations, counterparty screening and an integrity escalation record.
Independent professional review
Independent legal, tax, accounting or other authorised review within a written scope.
Conditions
Conditions are not drafted until every hard gate is confirmed.
Missing evidence
- Written mandate, decision authority and signatory capacity.
- Executed instruments and records establishing ownership, assignment and enforceability.
- Independent rules analysis covering the relevant associations, jurisdictions and influence restrictions.
- Conflict declarations, counterparty screening and an integrity escalation record.
- Independent legal, tax, accounting or other authorised review within a written scope.
Kill criteria
- Stop if mandate, authority, chain of title or enforceability ceases to be valid.
- Stop if applicable football rules or an authorised reviewer identifies prohibited third-party influence.
- Stop if an undisclosed conflict, integrity issue or counterparty restriction cannot be cured.
- Stop if required capital, liquidity or currency protection exceeds the approved commercial limit.
Scenario frame
No invented DCF or NPV.
The engine sets DCF and NPV to null. Qualified professionals must supply verified amounts, timing, tax, currency and discount-rate assumptions outside this browser screen.Base
- Map only executed contractual receipts, obligations, fees, taxes and payment dates.
- Test contractual payment dates against completion mechanics, set-off rights and collection evidence.
- Record assumptions, dependencies and the evidence owner for every cash-flow line.
Downside
- Stress delayed, reduced, disputed, offset or uncollectible contractual receipts.
- Stress additional funding, enforcement cost, tax leakage and counterparty default.
- Confirm the documented currency basis and any protection remains effective through settlement.
Upside
- Give no value credit to uncontracted demand, publicity or sporting outcomes.
- Model optional receipts only where the trigger, entitlement and collection path are evidenced.
- Keep upside outside the approval case until independently corroborated.